海归网首页   海归宣言   导航   博客   广告位价格  
海归论坛首页 会员列表 
收 藏 夹 
论坛帮助 
登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 论坛首页 |  排行榜  |  在线私聊 |  专题 | 版规 | 搜索  | RSS  | 注册 | 活动日历
主题: [讨论]Obama claims TARP is out of Supreme Court's author
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙
  阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题
作者 [讨论]Obama claims TARP is out of Supreme Court's author   
sundin




头衔: 海归少校

头衔: 海归少校
声望: 学员

加入时间: 2004/02/20
文章: 153

海归分: 19126





文章标题: [讨论]Obama claims TARP is out of Supreme Court's author (657 reads)      时间: 2009-6-09 周二, 16:52   

作者:sundin海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com

According to a response filed by the Solicitor General Elena Kagan on behalf of the United States of America, no court, not even the Supreme Court, has an authority to rule on the applicability of the TARP funds, previously designated exclusively for financial company bail outs, for the Chrysler case.

The Obama Administration argued Monday that no court, including the Supreme Court, has the authority to hear a challenge by Indiana benefit plans to the role the U.S. Treasury played in the Chrysler rescue, including the use of “bailout” (TARP) funds. The Indiana debt holders, U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan wrote, simply have no right to raise that issue, thus putting it out of the reach of the courts.

Although arguing that the courts may not rule on the validity of Treasury’s decision to shore up a new Chrysler company with funds from the Troubled Assets Relief Program, the Solicitor General did argue that those funds may go to a troubled auto company, and not just to banks or other regular financial institutions.

Convenient - so if not the highest judicial institution in the US can decide on what the proper venue for TARP utilization is, does that mean that Geithner and Obama are now completely above the law in terms of how they burn taxpayer cash. Of course, the SCOTUS decision is a moot point - nobody dares to stand in front of the Obama juggernaut at this point. However, this chain of events will inevitably set off a precedent of unintended consequences for not just domestic, but also foreign lenders, when it comes to investing into any US companies, especially ones deemed to be added next on the Too Big To Fail bandwagon.

作者:sundin海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com









相关主题
[讨论] 加州的兄弟姐妹,明天投HILLARY,不投OBAMA,理由见内: 海归主坛 2008-2-05 周二, 00:34
[讨论]以前本来是很不喜欢Hilary的, 但是如果在她和Obama中间选择 海归茶馆 2008-1-10 周四, 12:25
[讨论]急招海外精英,华人兼职,有无经验皆可 海归招聘 2024-5-29 周三, 10:19
[讨论]商贸公司招聘华人伙伴 海归招聘 2024-5-29 周三, 10:15
[讨论]招聘海外华人兼职时间自由高收益适合宝妈 海归招聘 2024-5-28 周二, 09:45
[讨论]需要工作或者宝妈,学生兼职的看过来 海归招聘 2024-5-28 周二, 09:44
[讨论]诚聘海外华人朋友 电商兼职 线上工作 海归招聘 2024-5-27 周一, 09:54
[讨论]招聘海外华人兼职时间自由高收益适合宝妈 海归招聘 2024-5-27 周一, 09:52

返回顶端
阅读会员资料 sundin离线  发送站内短信
  • [讨论]Obama claims TARP is out of Supreme Court's author -- sundin - (1665 Byte) 2009-6-09 周二, 16:52 (657 reads)
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, 
   热门标签 更多...
   论坛精华荟萃 更多...
   博客热门文章 更多...


海归网二次开发,based on phpbb
Copyright © 2005-2024 Haiguinet.com. All rights reserved.